Given the enormous span of potential strategies to address climate change, it is difficult to build consensus on what to prioritize. In 2021, we conducted 63 semi-structured interviews with climate change experts in the U.S. (N = 33) and India (N = 30). Experts indicated how they would address climate change through mitigation, adaptation, carbon dioxide removal (CDR), and solar geoengineering (SG). Our experts studied climate change from a variety of disciplines and were not necessarily subject matter experts in CDR or SG. Most experts stated that while more research is needed on CDR and SG, there is low appeal to deploying them in responding to climate change. Across our entire sample, we find that 44% of experts supported deploying CDR compared to 3% for SG. We also find that 17% of experts opposed the deployment of CDR, while twice as many (35%) opposed deploying SG. While there is far more support for traditional measures like mitigation and adaptation, most experts were hesitant to support technologies like CDR and SG to limit warming to 1.5 ◦C or 2 ◦C to prevent dangerous climate impacts, with statements tending toward a precautionary principle. Deep interdisciplinary engagement by climate change experts on CDR and SG is essential to understanding these technologies’ potential roles in addressing climate change and the perceptions of risk of these technologies held by experts who work on other areas of the climate problem. We highlight the potential for follow-up studies on broader expert opinions of CDR and SG, as well as evaluating whether perceptions and opinions are lagging behind fast-changing developments in the field.
